<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Betamax Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thestoragealchemist.com/betamax-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thestoragealchemist.com/betamax-redux/</link>
	<description>Turning Storage Technology into IT Gold</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:44:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Feshbach</title>
		<link>http://www.thestoragealchemist.com/betamax-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Feshbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupandbeyond.com/?p=64#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the answer...one other thing I hear from sales people and industry types is that EMC is adding or selling target based dedupe with/into the VTL customer base. It seems like a natural extenstion for EMC and a huge market. One industry analyst estimated (to me) that EMC owns at least 60% of the VTL market - the size of which I don&#039;t now recall?-  and that would be a good way to approximate the opportunity for QTM-based dedupe with EMC i.e. dedupe with complement or leap frog the VTL market. This something Data Domain just won&#039;t really penetrate...how should I think about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the answer&#8230;one other thing I hear from sales people and industry types is that EMC is adding or selling target based dedupe with/into the VTL customer base. It seems like a natural extenstion for EMC and a huge market. One industry analyst estimated (to me) that EMC owns at least 60% of the VTL market &#8211; the size of which I don&#8217;t now recall?-  and that would be a good way to approximate the opportunity for QTM-based dedupe with EMC i.e. dedupe with complement or leap frog the VTL market. This something Data Domain just won&#8217;t really penetrate&#8230;how should I think about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kenniston</title>
		<link>http://www.thestoragealchemist.com/betamax-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kenniston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupandbeyond.com/?p=64#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Matt - Great question.  The thought process is, where it makes the most sense, deduplicate as close to the source as possilbe.  This means that leverage deduplication as early in the process as possible.  For example, primary storage and soruce based backup deduplication are great fits for &#039;as close to the source as possible&#039; but an Oracle database with a high transaction rate wouldn&#039;t be a good fit for &#039;as close to the soruce as possible&#039;.  So we are trying to define use cases that give clear direction on where you get the most bang for you buck without impacting performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; Great question.  The thought process is, where it makes the most sense, deduplicate as close to the source as possilbe.  This means that leverage deduplication as early in the process as possible.  For example, primary storage and soruce based backup deduplication are great fits for &#8216;as close to the source as possible&#8217; but an Oracle database with a high transaction rate wouldn&#8217;t be a good fit for &#8216;as close to the soruce as possible&#8217;.  So we are trying to define use cases that give clear direction on where you get the most bang for you buck without impacting performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Feshbach</title>
		<link>http://www.thestoragealchemist.com/betamax-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Feshbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupandbeyond.com/?p=64#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I like your post and think this blog is great. When you say, &quot;duplicate as close to the source as possible&quot; how does that get applied practically between source-based and target-based dedupe. If understand it correctly even the DL line has edge-to-core capability so it could be close to the source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your post and think this blog is great. When you say, &#8220;duplicate as close to the source as possible&#8221; how does that get applied practically between source-based and target-based dedupe. If understand it correctly even the DL line has edge-to-core capability so it could be close to the source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.thestoragealchemist.com/betamax-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>John Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupandbeyond.com/?p=64#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Nice blog post, as someone who is also passionate about data protection, I&#039;m glad to see you creating some focus around this important, yet oft neglected IT dicipline.

Of course, having had a long history with NetWorker, and now working for one of EMC&#039;s competitors, we probably wont always see eye to eye, nonetheless, I look forward to seeing more from you on your road to recovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice blog post, as someone who is also passionate about data protection, I&#8217;m glad to see you creating some focus around this important, yet oft neglected IT dicipline.</p>
<p>Of course, having had a long history with NetWorker, and now working for one of EMC&#8217;s competitors, we probably wont always see eye to eye, nonetheless, I look forward to seeing more from you on your road to recovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skenniston</title>
		<link>http://www.thestoragealchemist.com/betamax-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>skenniston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupandbeyond.com/?p=64#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Thanks Chuck and all - We appreciate the support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chuck and all &#8211; We appreciate the support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hollis</title>
		<link>http://www.thestoragealchemist.com/betamax-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backupandbeyond.com/?p=64#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Hi guys -- thought I&#039;d drop by and see how y&#039;all are doing!

Nice blog -- you&#039;re off to a wonderful beginning!

-- Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys &#8212; thought I&#8217;d drop by and see how y&#8217;all are doing!</p>
<p>Nice blog &#8212; you&#8217;re off to a wonderful beginning!</p>
<p>&#8211; Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.thestoragealchemist.com @ 2012-02-05 21:54:58 -->
